Thursday, November 24, 2011

EB Games merging used and new games

This is my comment to an article, http://www.next-gen.biz/news/report-canadian-retailer-merges-new-and-used-sections  on the Edge website. Edge is a UK gaming industry retail magazine.




Sadly this is a growing case of buyer beware. Even walking into a big box store like Best Buy, that also sells used games, it is getting harder to distinguish between the new and used games. I am actually surprised it has taken a retailer this long to make this kind of move.

What is obvious to me is the timing of such a move. This is the peak time of year where gamers don't buy their games for themselves. With Christmas just weeks away, all of the gamers relatives are out en-mass with wish lists in tow. These are the poor unsuspecting souls who will not know that there is a difference between new and used within a gaming retailer and will just see the game their loved one wants and will pick it up without truly looking at the price or any words written on said price tag. Retailers usually put their name on the price tags, who would think that the new or used tag would be used there instead.

While this might have an immediate positive effect to the bottom line during the Christmas rush; when the gifts are opened and the truth comes out about the tactics used to sell an item you are only going to truly be hurting your bottom line in the long run. The fastest way to lose customers is to upset them or a relative. Imagine when the game is opened on Christmas day and the gamer goes to play the game only to realize that the game is used and that the features they expect are unavailable or they have to pay extra to get them. Are they going to go to the retailer first? No, they are going to go to the person who bought the game and enquirer why a used game was bought in the first place. Who would want a used game for Christmas? You now have two unhappy people; the gamer for getting a used game and the person who bought the game for feeling duped or even worse, ripped off. A customer who feels they have been cheated or ripped off is a retailer's nightmare. Because they usually have no qualm about going back to the store and complain or the other thing that usually happens is that no one involved in the situation goes back to the store again and they seek out alternatives to fill their loved one's requests in the future.

Case in point, my mother, who is in her late sixty's has opened a Steam account just so that she can play Pop-cap games and to take advantage of their quarterly sales when I (her son) or one of her grandchildren want a game for Christmas or for a Birthday. No fuss and we usually get the best version of the game and on top of that with Steam's wish list feature she doesn't even have to ask us what we want; she looks it up and just picks something off the list.

Want to fight the system on this one... don't go to the clerk behind the counter (they don't get paid enough to take crap from their bosses and from cheesed off customers) talk to the manager and ask for the regional manager/director's phone number. Complain up the chain to as close to the companies head office as you can get. If you get that far, they know that there are at least ten to twenty other customers who are upset and are not saying anything. Better yet use the tried and true method of showing a retailer you are upset with them. Stop buying from them in the first place.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Can the Oilers Get 100 + cents on the Dollar in a Trade?

This is a repost of a comment I made in Lowetide's blog.

I believe the only way Tambo will get 100 cents on the dollar in any trade is to make teams trying for a playoff run sweat (this will definitely be the case in trying to deal with ‘Stone Cold’ Lombardi.) That would mean that any trade will come later in the month and not now. I think the league perception is that this organization is still a laughing stock and that rep will not change until some serious hardball is played (on the ice and in the front office).

With Hemsky and Penner both having a year left in their contracts, Tambo has complete control in moving these players. It’s not like the Oilers can get any worse and they do not have salaries to dump. What leverage would another team have in getting a bad deal out of Tambo? While I think the Oilers will not get a deal that works in their interest at this moment; any deal that is not 100 cents or better on the dollar, closer to the trade deadline would have to be considered a bad trade (Even if the ‘MB’ is given a couple of more bullets for draft day). I have to admit I am not opposed to taking on a salery dump from another team if it helps get a better trade and the contract is not long term.

Another thing that may work in Tambo’s favour is that there are a lot of teams that are potential buyers; the only teams at this moment I would consider true sellers are the Devils, Islanders, Oilers and Sens. This will really work in the Oilers favour if the number of teams in contention for a playoff spot is still high. Also, in comparison to the other bottom feeders, the Oilers have better assists/depth in the farm system they can deal from.

(an aside: is Murray trying to get himself fired prior to the season ending, with the Fisher trade with Nashville? I understand that Fisher’s wife is a country music star and lives in Nashville, but to give him away for virtually nothing? If I was a Sens fan I would be losing it.)